-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 933
Open
Labels
editorialEditorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind.Editorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind.spec:miscellaneousFor issues that don't match any other spec labelFor issues that don't match any other spec labeltriage:deciding:community-feedbackOpen to community discussion. If the community can provide sufficient reasoning, it may be acceptedOpen to community discussion. If the community can provide sufficient reasoning, it may be accepted
Description
What are you trying to achieve?
We discussed this in the past already: currently we have 2 glossaries, one on the website and one here in the spec repo. I think this is fine except when there is a duplication of terms (and worst case conflicting definitions), so it would be good if we can find a way to either only have one glossary, or keep them "in sync", i.e. the spec glossary is authorative, we merge it into the docs glossary and add additional terms there that we might not want to have in the spec because they are not relevant enough or to vague.
Additional context.
A solution I could imagine is the following:
- have a YAML file (?) in spec that is rendered to the glossary in the spec
- have another YAML file in docs
- In docs we "merge" those 2 and render it to a global glossary under
https://opentelemetry.io/docs/concepts/glossary/
cc @open-telemetry/docs-approvers
cc @jpkrohling @danielgblanco @pellared as we discussed this during EU triage.
pellared, danielgblanco, chalin and arminru
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
editorialEditorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind.Editorial changes only (typos, changelog, ...). No content-related changes of any kind.spec:miscellaneousFor issues that don't match any other spec labelFor issues that don't match any other spec labeltriage:deciding:community-feedbackOpen to community discussion. If the community can provide sufficient reasoning, it may be acceptedOpen to community discussion. If the community can provide sufficient reasoning, it may be accepted