-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DHW #12
Comments
A few thoughts on how this might be implemented:
|
Is this issue for adding the ability to monitor DHW runs separately from heating? Or do we need another issue starting? emoncms then picking that up and being able to show COP for each of heating and DHW for those that can CT clamp the DHW times? |
I'm treating this Issue as what we'd change in heatpumpmonitor.org to have that provide a summary-level view of which systems listed there are CH-only versus mixed DHW and CH (and then ideally some indication of how mixed each one is). I agree with you Mick that it would be great to have some metrics that give us heat-to-CH versus heat-to-DHW and the ability to measure CoP for CH versus CoP for DHW. I presume that means changing the MyHeatpump app (as distinct from heatpumpmonitor.org) so would the better place for an issue on that subject by the 'app' repo https://github.com/emoncms/app/issues ? (While that would probably be the strictly-correct thing to do, the distinction might be lost on most people, so maybe we keep all the issues together, in here?) So, in summary:
|
The site already captures which systems do or do not have have DHW in the When we're able to do advanced filtering (#10) then it'll be possible to exclude systems without DHW, for example.
This last item is captured in the system form, but the other two are not. Should we add them? Or is the form long enough?
This is now provided directly by My Heatpump app, though HeatpumpMonitor doesn't aggregate this data yet -> #41 |
It would be a good idea to record display which systems are doing DHW + CH and which systems are just doing CH. Eg Adams SCOP is very impressive but obviously needs to be caveated and can't be directly compared with a system that's doing CH + DHW
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: