Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
|
Hello! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@aborruso - there is a bit of a hack that you can do to get the metadata in, by just taking the DuckDB output and then writing a new output that sets the metadata right. I do this in my geoparquet-tools library - if you use projected data it'll read the CRS, save it, and then rewrite the DuckDB output using pyarrow. I have not added support in for other input formats, but you should be able to use gdal or duckdb to convert the shapefile to geoparquet, and then use mine to sort and write it out. Or feel free to just borrow the code / use pyarrow directly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @cholmes your tool is great, thank you. However, let me understand if I have figured out how I can do it independently:
Is it right? When duckdb is compatible with the geoparquet v1.1.0 specification, it will no longer be necessary and I can use duckdb directly. Am I right @Maxxen ? Thank you |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I have read the great doc "Best Practices for Distributing GeoParquet" and I have used this kind of query on my input file
My input is an EPSG:3035 shapefile.
The geoparquet output file I create has the right coordinates values (the same of the input), but this file is wrong associated to EPSG:4326.
How do I get a correct metadata assignment? Am I required to convert everything to 4326 first?
Thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions