Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schemas: QUDT -- URI or id ? Add an example? #909

Closed
jerstlouis opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #920
Closed

Schemas: QUDT -- URI or id ? Add an example? #909

jerstlouis opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #920
Assignees

Comments

@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

jerstlouis commented Mar 13, 2024

In the last Coverages Sprint we had discussed the Schemas units and were wondering whether QUDT would be specified as a unit or as a URI:

opengeospatial/ogcapi-coverages#173 (comment)

I believe this is still not clearly communicated. It would be good to clarify that, and perhaps also add an example using QUDT to dispel any confusion. ( https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/23-058.html#additional-keywords )

@cportele
Copy link
Member

OK, so maybe we should also specify in /req/schemas/unit how to specify QUDT units like we do for UCUM.

@ghobona
Copy link
Contributor

ghobona commented Mar 14, 2024

Please note that @nicholascar has advocated for QUDT at previous OGC-NA meetings.

@cportele cportele self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
@cportele
Copy link
Member

Meeting 2024-04-22: Add the requirement and example. Include the full URI (e.g. "https://qudt.org/vocab/unit/HectoPA") as the value and "QUDT" as the value for unitLang.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants