Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Part 4: Editorial link inconsistencies #947

Open
fmigneault opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Part 4: Editorial link inconsistencies #947

fmigneault opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@fmigneault
Copy link

For example: https://portal.ogc.org/files/108198#options
Shows:
image

Because there is a strong connection between the "actual" HTTP methods, and the different requirements/chapters in the standard, links (such as the PATCH in the image) should be added consistently across the document when referring to the requirement. This will remove the ambiguity with situations where "HTTP PATCH" for example is used to refer to the HTTP method in general (or as per the HTTP specification), rather than the OGC requirement.

@cportele
Copy link
Member

Meeting 2024-08-12: @cportele will look into this. Probably simply the PATCH link needs to be removed. Check also other cases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants