Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Open-Source Course #226

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @XyDrKRulof (Darius Jakobeit)
Repository: https://github.com/upb-lea/reinforcement_learning_course_materials
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 2023 edition - v1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/8d90df795c6c49a039c89870ec1d7383"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/8d90df795c6c49a039c89870ec1d7383/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/8d90df795c6c49a039c89870ec1d7383/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/8d90df795c6c49a039c89870ec1d7383)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @XyDrKRulof. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@XyDrKRulof if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=2.23 s (88.8 files/s, 121841.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                             94            220             83         196400
TeX                             18            688           1442           8315
Jupyter Notebook                43              0          51980           7238
MATLAB                          16            457            405           2303
Markdown                        18            100              0            480
Python                           8            349            688            468
YAML                             1              7             10             32
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           198           1821          54608         215236
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1516

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8127026 is OK
- 10.1038/nature16961 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z is OK
- 10.1109/OJPEL.2021.3065877 is OK
- 10.1177/0278364913495721 is OK
- 10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182718 is OK
- 10.1109/OJIES.2021.3075521 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

@XyDrKRulof
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3509134 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8127026 is OK
- 10.1038/nature16961 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z is OK
- 10.1109/OJPEL.2021.3065877 is OK
- 10.1177/0278364913495721 is OK
- 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964 is OK
- 10.1109/FES57669.2023.10182718 is OK
- 10.1109/OJIES.2021.3075521 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Lectures on Reinforcement Learning
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reprod...
- No DOI given, and none found for title:  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heter...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Dee...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: OpenAI Gym
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Stable-Baselines3: Reliable Reinforcement Learning...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a Gene...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Rei...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Finance ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: An Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Model for...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: API design for machine learning software: experien...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@XyDrKRulof
Copy link

Based on the list of possible reviewers I would - based on their expertise - suggest abuccts, ahmaurya, krother or lebebr01.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants