Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: KinesinLMS: A Simple and Practical Learning Management System for (Very) Small Teams #257

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 15 comments

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @danielmcquillen (Daniel McQuillen)
Repository: https://github.com/ScienceCommunicationLab/KinesinLMS
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/27257652b5adfcc8449dae9a98d647ac)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @danielmcquillen. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@danielmcquillen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002458 is OK
- 10.1007/s44217-024-00143-5 is OK
- 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4958 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Hypermedia Systems
- No DOI given, and none found for title: DHH - Ruby on Rails, 37signals, and the Future of ...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cookiecutter/Cookiecutter-Django: Cookiecutter Dja...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.68 s (1581.3 files/s, 186063.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         469           9918           8700          39785
JSON                            30              3              0          23004
HTML                           326           3137             65          15900
JavaScript                      27            974            122           6974
Sass                            34           1470             48           5580
TypeScript                      56            546            434           3334
Markdown                        66           1123              0           2522
CSS                             21            158             33            560
SVG                             26              0             19            464
XML                              1              0              0            330
YAML                             6             35             24            186
Bourne Shell                     3             23             18            110
TOML                             1             20             10             80
TeX                              1              6              0             57
INI                              1              0              0              5
reStructuredText                 1              4              0              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                          1069          17417           9473          98895
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   102	Daniel McQuillen
     8	danielmcquillen

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1334

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Problem with ORCID (https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6149-4400) for Daniel McQuillen. ORCID looks to be the wrong length.

@danielmcquillen
Copy link

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@danielmcquillen
Copy link

danielmcquillen commented Sep 12, 2024

valentina-s suchow stefania11 JasonJWilliamsNY gcdeshpande lechten fbidu Would you be interested in reviewing our paper submission to JOSE on KinesinLMS, an open-source, developer-friendly LMS for small teams?

@lechten
Copy link

lechten commented Sep 13, 2024

Thanks for asking, yes, I'm willing to review this. At first glance, spaces are missing after "KinesinLMS" in several places, e.g., l. 52, 74, 82

@danielmcquillen
Copy link

@lechten Thanks for your interest! Typos are fixed.

@danielmcquillen
Copy link

Hi @lechten Is there anything else we can do to make a review easier for you? Thanks for your time!

@lechten
Copy link

lechten commented Sep 24, 2024

Hi @danielmcquillen, currently this issue is called "[PRE REVIEW]". I guess that there should be a new issue or change to "[REVIEW]" before I start. In the past, such issues were accompanied by checklists for reviewers. E.g., see #138...

@danielmcquillen
Copy link

danielmcquillen commented Sep 25, 2024

@lechten Hmm. I'm not sure if I have authority to move status to review or to create the review checklist...looks like other issues have an editor assigned. @labarba can you provide any guidance here? Thanks!

@danielmcquillen
Copy link

@lechten Looks like no one is available at the moment to have a look at our submission. Thanks for your help to date I hope you're available in the future if it gets moved to REVIEW!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants