Skip to content

PoC the use of the new multicluster-runtime instead of KCPs controller-runtime fork #258

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
aaronschweig opened this issue Jun 4, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #261
Open

PoC the use of the new multicluster-runtime instead of KCPs controller-runtime fork #258

aaronschweig opened this issue Jun 4, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #261
Assignees

Comments

@aaronschweig
Copy link
Member

aaronschweig commented Jun 4, 2025

After a recent discussion with Marvin from the KCP team, I found out, that the fork of the controller-runtime that was previously used to foster a KCP integration will not be maintained anylonger and should be replaced by the new mutlicluster-runtime.

The multicluster-runtime is mainly a drop in replacement with some additional features on top that help to manage different shards in the future. An example how a controller would be written with the new library can be found here:

https://github.com/kcp-dev/multicluster-provider/tree/main/examples/apiexport.

The task would consist of ensuring that the account-operator is able to work as is, with replacing the current controller-runtime based implementation with the mutlicluster runtime.

It would be great to achieve this migration with as little change needed as possible, especially in the shared library. With the help of the local-setup the implementation should be able to be validated quite well.

The upstream codebase of the mutlicluster-runtime can be found here: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multicluster-runtime

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants