Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use mapURI to provide an exhaustive list of example URIs for certain LDA methods #14

Open
egonw opened this issue Aug 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Aug 7, 2015

The current LDA documentation often has an example URIs for a compound, protein, or gene, but there is some use for more examples to give people an indication what database-style URIs they can use. The reference example from the IMS telcon today is the use of Wikipedia URLs for compounds.

The idea is to add the following text to the appropriate LDA documentation:

More example URIs are found [here].

The [here] could link to a page listing more examples. In reply to using a support.ops.org page, the suggestion was made to use a generated list. Such lists are already generated at two places:

But the production IMS is not public so it would not have the advantage of the first that it always be consistent (because it uses the exact same API version and thus data).

@danidi
Copy link

danidi commented Aug 7, 2015

The IMS link would have the advantage that no API keys are necessary. A disadvantage of both would be that the link is rather long to display in the documentation. Not sure if is is possible to only show "here" and make it an actual link on the doc page?

@egonw
Copy link
Member Author

egonw commented Aug 7, 2015

@danidi agreed... [here] should show visually just "here" and the hyperlink should be hidden. If that is technically possible needs to be explored. This was basically my question to @antonisloizou ... we'll figure that out. Possibly, we use a URL shortener :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants