fix:fix page bug #199
fix:fix page bug #199
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request removes the default initialization of several Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code Definitions (1)app/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/config/context/DefaultLoginUserContext.java (3)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/entity/App.java(3 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java (3)
141-151: LGTM: Improved null handling and page processing logic.The refactoring adds proper null checking and only processes pages where
isPageis true, which is a good improvement for robustness.
429-437: LGTM: Good extraction of update logic.The extraction of update logic into a dedicated method improves code organization and follows the Single Responsibility Principle.
440-442:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the depth checking logic.
The method checks if
page.getDepth() == 0 || page.getDepth().equals(parentInfo.getDepth()), but the method name and usage context suggest it should detect when depth should be updated, not when it should remain the same.Consider if the logic should be inverted or renamed to better reflect its purpose:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify how shouldUpdateDepth is used in the codebase grep -r "shouldUpdateDepth" --include="*.java" .Length of output: 321
Attention: Revisit the Depth-Checking Condition in shouldUpdateDepth
The current implementation returns true when either:
page.getDepth()is 0 (i.e. an unset state), orpage.getDepth()equalsparentInfo.getDepth()Given the method’s name—suggesting it indicates when the page’s depth should be updated—this check may be ambiguous. In particular, updating the depth based on equality with the parent’s depth might be counterintuitive if the intent is to update when there’s a discrepancy.
- Clarify the intent: Should the depth be updated when it is unset (0) or only when it differs from the parent’s expected depth?
- Consider renaming if necessary: If the current condition is correct (e.g., it’s actually verifying that the depth is already aligned with the parent’s), a name change might better convey its purpose.
Please review the intended behavior and adjust the logic or naming accordingly.
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/app/impl/PageServiceImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit