修改区块分组问题 #201
修改区块分组问题 #201
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new method, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Controller as BlockGroupController
participant Service as BlockGroupServiceImpl
participant Handler as MyMetaObjectHandler
participant Context as LoginUserContext
Client->>Controller: createBlockGroups(request)
Controller->>Service: createBlockGroup(blockGroup)
Service->>Handler: insertFill(blockGroup)
Handler->>Context: getSiteId() & getPlatformId()
Context-->>Handler: Return context info
Handler-->>Service: BlockGroup with meta filled
Service-->>Controller: Result<BlockGroup>
Controller-->>Client: Result<BlockGroup>
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/context/LoginUserContext.java (1)
49-49: Add JavaDoc comment for consistency.The newly added
getSiteId()method is missing JavaDoc comments. All other methods in this interface include detailed JavaDoc comments that describe their purpose and return values. Add a JavaDoc comment to maintain code documentation consistency.+ /** + * 返回当前站点信息 + * @return 站点ID + */ public String getSiteId();base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MockUserContext.java (1)
45-46: Format method for consistency.The implementation of
getSiteId()uses a single-line format unlike other methods in the class. Consider formatting it consistently with the rest of the class.- @Override - public String getSiteId() { return "1"; } + @Override + public String getSiteId() { + return "1"; + }app/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/config/context/DefaultLoginUserContext.java (1)
47-48: Format method for consistency.The implementation of
getSiteId()uses a single-line format unlike other methods in the class. Consider formatting it consistently with the rest of the implementations.- @Override - public String getSiteId() { return "1"; } + @Override + public String getSiteId() { + return "1"; + }base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockGroupController.java (3)
63-64: Unused injected dependency.The newly added
loginUserContextfield is autowired but not used anywhere in the class. If this field is intended to be used in future implementations or by other methods not shown in the file, consider adding a comment explaining its purpose.@Autowired + // Used for obtaining user context information for block group operations private LoginUserContext loginUserContext;
117-117: Inconsistency between method name and return type.The method name
createBlockGroups(plural) now returns a singleBlockGroupobject instead of a list. This inconsistency could be confusing for developers working with this API.Consider renaming the method to match its singular return type:
- public Result<BlockGroup> createBlockGroups(@Valid @RequestBody BlockGroup blockGroup) { + public Result<BlockGroup> createBlockGroup(@Valid @RequestBody BlockGroup blockGroup) { return blockGroupService.createBlockGroup(blockGroup); }Additionally, the Swagger documentation at line 107 refers to the parameter as "blockGroups" (plural), which should also be updated for consistency.
104-114: Update Swagger documentation to match new return type.The method's return type has changed from a list to a single
BlockGroup, but the Swagger documentation still suggests multiple block groups.Update the Swagger documentation to clearly indicate that a single block group is created and returned:
@Operation(summary = "创建区块分组", description = "创建区块分组", parameters = { - @Parameter(name = "blockGroups", description = "入参对象") + @Parameter(name = "blockGroup", description = "入参对象") }, responses = { @ApiResponse(responseCode = "200", description = "返回信息", content = @Content(mediaType = "application/json", schema = @Schema(implementation = BlockGroup.class))), @ApiResponse(responseCode = "400", description = "请求失败")} )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
app/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/config/context/DefaultLoginUserContext.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/context/LoginUserContext.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MyMetaObjectHandler.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockGroupController.java(3 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/BlockGroupService.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImpl.java(3 hunks)base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MockUserContext.java(1 hunks)base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockGroupControllerTest.java(1 hunks)base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImplTest.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/BlockGroupService.java (1)
74-74: LGTM! Return type change improves API clarity.The return type change from
Result<List<BlockGroup>>toResult<BlockGroup>is appropriate since it appears this method creates a single block group. This change makes the API more precise and easier to understand.base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MyMetaObjectHandler.java (1)
45-46: Good addition of siteId and platformId fields to insertFill methodThese additions properly extend the entity metadata with user context information, maintaining consistency with other user-related fields like tenantId and renterId. This enhancement improves the data model by capturing additional user context attributes during entity creation.
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImplTest.java (1)
114-114: Return type update matches implementationThe test now correctly expects a single BlockGroup object instead of a list in the result, which aligns with the changes in the service implementation. This ensures test consistency with the updated method signature.
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockGroupServiceImpl.java (3)
167-167: Method signature correctly updated to return single BlockGroupThe return type has been appropriately changed from
Result<List<BlockGroup>>toResult<BlockGroup>, which simplifies the API by returning a single object instead of a list containing one object.
176-176: Return statement simplified to match updated signatureThe return statement has been properly updated to return the direct BlockGroup result instead of wrapping it in a singleton list, maintaining consistency with the updated method signature.
216-216: Bug fix: Using correct blockGroup ID in query parameterThis change fixes a bug by using
blockGroupTemp.getId()instead of what was likelyblockGroup.getId()before. This ensures the correct host ID is used when querying block carriers relations, preventing potential data inconsistencies.base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockGroupControllerTest.java (2)
66-66: Updated mock return type for createBlockGroupThe mock setup is correctly updated to return a
Result<BlockGroup>instead of a list, matching the changes in the service implementation.
68-68: Updated variable type to match new return typeThe result variable is now correctly typed as
Result<BlockGroup>to match the controller method's updated return type.
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockGroupControllerTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tests