Skip to content

Conversation

@ynezz
Copy link
Member

@ynezz ynezz commented Nov 9, 2024

In some cases it might be handy to quickly smoke test certain types of
changes, where it usually doesn't make sense to build everything, so
lets allow that with reusable label-kernel and label-target workflows,
which can be easily reusable by just passing target/subtarget (and testing) inputs.

Goals

Testing

@Ansuel
Copy link
Member

Ansuel commented Nov 9, 2024

@ynezz and how would you trigger this? manual call?

ynezz added a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
@ynezz ynezz force-pushed the ynezz/single-kernel branch from 6d06f10 to ca76f61 Compare November 9, 2024 11:39
ynezz added a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
@ynezz
Copy link
Member Author

ynezz commented Nov 9, 2024

@ynezz and how would you trigger this? manual call?

openwrt/openwrt@cdeebff in openwrt/openwrt#16800

@ynezz
Copy link
Member Author

ynezz commented Nov 9, 2024

@ynezz
Copy link
Member Author

ynezz commented Nov 14, 2024

@ynezz ynezz force-pushed the ynezz/single-kernel branch from ca76f61 to 55b067c Compare November 15, 2024 08:38
ynezz added a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
ynezz added a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
ynezz added a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
ynezz added a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
@ynezz ynezz changed the title Add single-kernel workflow Make label-target and label-kernel reusable Nov 15, 2024
ynezz added a commit to ynezz/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
@ynezz
Copy link
Member Author

ynezz commented Nov 17, 2024

In some cases it might be handy to quickly smoke test certain types of
changes, where it usually doesn't make sense to build everything, so
lets allow that with reusable label-kernel workflow, which can be easily
reusable by just passing target/subtarget/testing inputs.

References: openwrt/openwrt#16784
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <[email protected]>
In some cases it might be handy to quickly smoke test certain types of
changes, where it usually doesn't make sense to build everything, so
lets allow that with reusable label-target workflow, which can be easily
reusable by just passing target/subtarget inputs.

References: openwrt/openwrt#16784
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <[email protected]>
@ynezz ynezz force-pushed the ynezz/single-kernel branch from f251196 to 4694f67 Compare November 17, 2024 14:16
ynezz added a commit to ynezz/openwrt that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2024
@ynezz
Copy link
Member Author

ynezz commented Nov 18, 2024

label-target - catch automatically on CI issues like openwrt/openwrt#16937 (broken apk)

Actually there might be some other issue somewhere else, because https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/16937/checks contains already the full build for malta/be and x86/64 (CI passing), but manual full build for mediatek/filogic fails https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/actions/runs/11832629914/job/32969780999?pr=16937

@ynezz ynezz marked this pull request as draft November 18, 2024 07:59
teknoraver pushed a commit to teknoraver/openwrt that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
@Ansuel Ansuel force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 94e64ba to c7ec823 Compare July 24, 2025 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants