Skip to content

Conversation

@ldir-EDB0
Copy link
Contributor

Without this, all the clients get the same timeouts and try to renew addresses at the same time. Reduce the T1 & T2 by a pseudo random 0 to 127 seconds, thus the renew attempts are likely to be spread out a bit in time.

What do we think? Sensible? Stupid?

Without this, all the clients get the same timeouts and try to renew
addresses at the same time.  Reduce the T1 & T2 by a pseudo random 0 to
127 seconds, thus the renew attempts are likely to be spread out a bit
in time.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <[email protected]>
@systemcrash
Copy link
Contributor

Sensible - helps guard against update avalanches.

@schuettecarsten
Copy link

Nice idea, patch needs to be updated to work with latest odhcpd codebase

@systemcrash
Copy link
Contributor

ping @ldir-EDB0 to update this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants