How does the new 'expiration' feature interact with caveats? #2192
Closed
spacecheeserocks
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
You use
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Sounds good to me! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Regarding the newly merged 'relationship expiration' feature #2152, does anyone know how this feature would interact with caveats at all?
I can see the example schema in the pull request:
And I can see that the expiration time is passed as a new parameter, as per the example.
However, if I wanted to combine this expiration with a caveat, is this possible, and how would it be represented in the schema? I would expect something like the following, but I don't believe there's currently a way to specify multiple
with
constraints...Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions