Shouldn't 'go' be a dependency in the homebrew package? #1484
Closed
SamAtAnyRoad
started this conversation in
Ideas, Issue Triage, and General discussions
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
People can install Go in other ways... that's why it isn't there... but maybe it indeed should be... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Sweet! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I feel crazy even bringing this up, but... goreleaser can't run without go.
I just tried using goreleaser for the first time, after spotting it in the makefile for a thing I wanted. Homebrew install was painlessly easy. The makefile still failed. Because I didn't have go installed. I installed go. Then everything ran without a hitch.
Since goreleaser needs go to run, it SHOULD have go listed as one of its dependencies, right? Right? Am I crazy? This feels crazy.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions