Decision thread: Gitcoin bounties

[djfnd]

Using this thread to seek rough consensus on how we should allocate out our Gitcoin funds.

As a reminder, the total amount we have received from Gitcoin is $2,923. We have decided to allocate $400 (lets call it $423) towards hosting fees for the next 12 months. Thus we have $2,500 that we can allocate towards development / community bounties.

edited based on the proposal from @neatonk
In the Gitcoin beta round funding proposals thread there are three areas of interest:

• neume-scan a front-end explorer for neume ($1k)
• neume-pub functionality to publish neume data to arweave for free via bundlr ($500)
• neume-lore articles to improve outward communication ($200 per article)
• Optimism strategy a strategy to index optimism ($800)

If we decided to go for all four, with the amount against each, then it would mean that we could do everything (albeit it only one article for the neume-lore strand.

What do you guys think?
cc: @il3ven @neatonk @reimertz @estmcmxci

[djfnd]

My vote is to go for all three as described.

[neatonk]

I've added a new proposal that could potentially be included here. If it were to be included I would suggest either rolling it into the neume-scan proposal or allocating some portion of the neume-scan money to it, since it would greatly reduce the amount of work needed to implement neume-scan. I am happy to steward this proposal if it's included.

#28 (comment)

Generally speaking, I think it would be ideal to use these proposals as a way to engage new contributors. I also support splitting the funds across the proposals as it will allow us to potentially engage more new contributors. This assumes that the bounty for each proposal is sufficient to attract contributors who may or may not already have an interest in Neume.

[djfnd]

I'm very in favour of this proposal. And the suggestion of reducing the neume-scan bounty to $1k, to allow for $500 towards this one.

[djfnd]

Updated the original post in line with this.

[estmcmxci]

Re: Neume Lore, I agree that the priority should be to fund core development. The purpose of Neume lore then should be to create public communication and identify marketing channels to syndicate core dev updates.

For now, then, let's aim to write an introduction and roadmap for Neume that includes these developments. We can use future funding rounds to fund the Neume lore work stream, in the future.

Re: Neume scan, my only concern about reducing the bounty from 1k to 500 is if it will be enough incentive for developers to complete the task. I see the development of Neume scan as a milestone that we can use to tap into different grant streams, such as ENS DAO Public Goods grants which can offer up to $50,000 USDC.

[djfnd]

@il3ven I have launched the neume-scan bounty with the reward as stated above, however, remember that you mentioned that we could reduce the Optimism strategy one if you want to take that on instead, and thus increase the others (possible neume-scan) inline. What do you think?

[Vikja123]

Здравствуйте!Пытаюсь разобратся

[DimYgrnnn]

Вибачте а чи можна тут писати іноземною мовою?