-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bibliography link anchors inconsistent #3760
Comments
This is not considered a bug by DocumenterCitations.jl but a feature (see e.g. JuliaDocs/DocumenterCitations.jl#63) as this allows for multiple anchors for a single bib entry |
OK. Is this something we can fix with the style? PS: I still consider this a bug with how our bibliography looks like. Unless you are saying that we do this on purpose and don't want to change it. |
I don't understand how the linked DocumenterCitations.jl issue justifies this: all the bib items I looked at had a DOI but not an URL field. While that issue is about putting
So I would still suggest we try to appeal this to them. But if they refuse this, we should monkey-patch or otherwise hack it, or fork DocumenterCitations. The current behavior is bad. |
I reported this upstream in JuliaDocs/DocumenterCitations.jl#73 and provided a draft PR for this as well. Let's wait for the DocumenterCitations' maintainer's comments there before we roll something too complicated ourselves. |
The current behavior is definitely a conscious design decision, see JuliaDocs/DocumenterCitations.jl#73 (comment). If you only want to have one link (you are careful to only have a DOI or a URL in all entries), then I agree it makes sense to consistently have this link from the title. I'm open to PRs to |
I just tagged DocumenterCitations 1.3.4 with the fixes from JuliaDocs/DocumenterCitations.jl#74 |
Thanks a lot for getting this in this quickly!! |
Looking at https://docs.oscar-system.org/dev/references/, it seems that for the link of an item the anchor (the thing I can click on) is either the title (maybe for books and things in proceedings?) or the journal information (for articles?).
It looks rather odd.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: