-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for parachains-staking pallet #886
Comments
any time estimate in the sense of which month for the implementation? |
So currently, I am working on giving xcm message parsing support for Sidecar, once that is done I can start spearheading these endpoints. Given that this is also part of "parachain - support", it kinda gets a bump in priority. So I would say i'll roughly start this sometime within the |
Any update on this one? |
Hey @PizBernina, sorry for the delayed response, I was on a break when you brought this back up. We actually haven't started this yet, let me have a chat with the team and see if we can raise this priority. |
As a note though: my one apprehension as to making this a priority is there is no standardization for this pallet across chains. For example, both Kilt and Moonbeam use a parachain-staking pallet, but everything is either named different or has different functionality. This is a concern when building out the service because it's so specific to a parachain. Just a thought. |
Feature Request to add support for parachains-staking pallet. These are currently used within the KILT protocol, and Moonbeam.
*I dont know the full scope of the parachains pallet yet, but will continue to update the issue with more information as time goes on.
Request
paths
/accounts/{accountId}/parachain-staking-info
/accounts/{accountId}/parachain-staking-payouts
/pallet/staking/progress
query params
at
Responses tbd, but should be somewhat similar to the current staking pallet support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: