Skip to content

Conversation

@YusafAwan
Copy link
Contributor

@YusafAwan YusafAwan commented Mar 18, 2025

EVEREST-1719 Powered by Pull Request Badge

Updated table.ts to fix row selection issues and created tests for restore to a new cluster. Some code is commented out as it requires additional fixes before merging.
Jira Ticket: Everest-1719

@YusafAwan YusafAwan requested a review from tplavcic March 18, 2025 12:39
@YusafAwan YusafAwan requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2025 12:39
@YusafAwan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabio-silva @dianabirs @tplavcic Can you please review this PR. Thanks

@tplavcic tplavcic changed the title Updated table.ts and added restore-new-cluster.e2e.ts for Everest-1719 EVEREST-1719 - Updated table.ts and added restore-new-cluster.e2e.ts Mar 21, 2025
@YusafAwan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the feedback! I'm currently working on another high-priority task and plan to get back to this PR later next week.

tplavcic and others added 4 commits April 17, 2025 15:30
- Replace manual loop with moveForward() and use test.step() blocks for clarity
- Dynamically inject clusterName and restoredClusterName into test titles
- Improve backup schedule creation and validation flow for primary and restored clusters
- Add waitForDbListLoad() for consistent DB list readiness before deletion
- Refactor findRowAndClickActions to use new getClusterRow() for more precise row targeting
- Clean up and unify row selectors across table.ts utility functions
tplavcic

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@YusafAwan YusafAwan requested a review from tplavcic April 29, 2025 13:03
@tplavcic tplavcic changed the title EVEREST-1719 - Updated table.ts and added restore-new-cluster.e2e.ts EVEREST-1719 - Add test for restore to new cluster from scheduled backup May 7, 2025
@tplavcic tplavcic merged commit eeb4673 into main May 7, 2025
9 checks passed
@tplavcic tplavcic deleted the Everest-1719 branch May 7, 2025 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants