Skip to content

Conversation

@nastena1606
Copy link
Collaborator

modified: docs/ReleaseNotes/Kubernetes-Operator-for-PostgreSQL-RN2.7.0.md
new file: docs/ReleaseNotes/Kubernetes-Operator-for-PostgreSQL-RN2.8.0.md
modified: docs/ReleaseNotes/index.md
modified: docs/assets/templates/pdf_cover_page.tpl
modified: mkdocs-base.yml
modified: requirements.txt
modified: variables.yml

modified:   docs/ReleaseNotes/Kubernetes-Operator-for-PostgreSQL-RN2.7.0.md
        new file:   docs/ReleaseNotes/Kubernetes-Operator-for-PostgreSQL-RN2.8.0.md
        modified:   docs/ReleaseNotes/index.md
        modified:   docs/assets/templates/pdf_cover_page.tpl
        modified:   mkdocs-base.yml
        modified:   requirements.txt
        modified:   variables.yml
* [K8SPG-460](https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/K8SPG-460) - The Operator now correctly enables and used Huge pages functionality if they are enabled on the OS level.
* [K8SPG-570](https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/K8SPG-570) - The Operator now correctly respects custom user passwords defined in secrets when creating new users, and automatically adds any missing credentials.

* [K8SPG-611](https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/K8SPG-611) - The operator now uses official Percona PostgreSQL docker images, which are compatible only with specific latest PostgreSQL versions.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think this should be a release highlight and explicitly mention supported versions

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


* [K8SPG-748](https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/K8SPG-748) - The PerconaPGCluster status now provides more comprehensive details, including persistent volume resizing and pgBackRest backup conditions.

* [K8SPG-752](https://perconadev.atlassian.net/browse/K8SPG-752)- Allowed setting loadBalancerClass service type and use a custom implementation of a load balancer rather than the cloud provider default one.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is duplicated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants