Skip to content

Conversation

@artemgavrilov
Copy link
Contributor

@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov commented Nov 6, 2025

PMM-14517

Link to the Feature Build: SUBMODULES-4069

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 15.78947% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 45.72%. Comparing base (586a922) to head (19425e9).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ent/agents/postgres/pgstatmonitor/pgstatmonitor.go 0.00% 21 Missing ⚠️
...nts/postgres/pgstatmonitor/pgstatmonitor_models.go 0.00% 8 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ents/postgres/pgstatstatements/pgstatstatements.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##               v3    #4739      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   45.75%   45.72%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         364      364              
  Lines       37755    37790      +35     
==========================================
+ Hits        17275    17281       +6     
- Misses      18823    18851      +28     
- Partials     1657     1658       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
admin 17.92% <ø> (ø)
agent 53.54% <0.00%> (-0.17%) ⬇️
managed 46.23% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
vmproxy 72.09% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 18:29
@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov requested review from a team and JiriCtvrtka as code owners November 10, 2025 18:29
@artemgavrilov artemgavrilov requested review from BupycHuk and ademidoff and removed request for a team November 10, 2025 18:29
@artemgavrilov
Copy link
Contributor Author

For PGSS we collecting very limited set of data and I don't know why. I implemented new PG18 data only for PGSM for now. PGSS should be discussed I think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants