You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was trying to find a little bit more about how TotalBytesAllocated works as it wasn't clear to me at the beginning whether it tries to compute sum of allocations program makes during its run, or whether it measures size of the heap at the end of run.
I think both variants have reasonable use cases: the first one is concerned with memory and GC pressure, the second one is good when looking for memory leaks.
Finally I found GcTotalMemoryCollector class from which it seems to me that the current implementation is kind of hybrid between the two variants: it's not the sum of allocations as it asks for GC.GetTotalMemory only once; it also not the total heap size as it refuses to call GetTotalMemory(true). It's totally possible I read the code in a wrong way and this reasoning doesn't apply.
I would suggest to
update documentation that would clarify the meaning of the option;
think about creating two distinct options with clear use cases.
I'm willing to help if someone more knowledgeable validates my suspicions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was trying to find a little bit more about how
TotalBytesAllocated
works as it wasn't clear to me at the beginning whether it tries to compute sum of allocations program makes during its run, or whether it measures size of the heap at the end of run.I think both variants have reasonable use cases: the first one is concerned with memory and GC pressure, the second one is good when looking for memory leaks.
Finally I found
GcTotalMemoryCollector
class from which it seems to me that the current implementation is kind of hybrid between the two variants: it's not the sum of allocations as it asks forGC.GetTotalMemory
only once; it also not the total heap size as it refuses to callGetTotalMemory(true)
. It's totally possible I read the code in a wrong way and this reasoning doesn't apply.I would suggest to
I'm willing to help if someone more knowledgeable validates my suspicions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: