You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using MPICH 4.0.3 and prior, I encounter an incorrect I/O result.
It happens when using MPI_Type_indexed() or MPI_Type_create_hindexed()
to concatenate multiple datatype created from MPI_Type_create_subarray().
The concatenated datatype is then used to define a fileview, when opening
a file. Adding printf statement inside of ROMIO reveals incorrect flattened
file offset-length pairs.
This issue does not happen when using MPICH 4.1 and later. As pointed out
in issue #7163, it is because MPIX_Type_iov functions are used to flatten
the fileview datatype since version 4.1 and MPIX_Type_iov functions
appear to be able to produce correct offset-length pairs.
I encountered this problem when running jobs on Perlmutter at NERSC,
whose MPI makes use of a ROMIO from MPICH earlier than 4.1. I believe
there are other MPI vendors that also use an older version of ROMIO.
The difference between the two programs are the call to MPI_Type_indexed() and MPI_Type_create_hindexed().
If they are replaced by MPI_Type_create_struct(), as
in struct_fsize.c, then the generated offset-length pairs
are correct and hence the test program passed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using MPICH 4.0.3 and prior, I encounter an incorrect I/O result.
It happens when using
MPI_Type_indexed()
orMPI_Type_create_hindexed()
to concatenate multiple datatype created from
MPI_Type_create_subarray()
.The concatenated datatype is then used to define a fileview, when opening
a file. Adding printf statement inside of ROMIO reveals incorrect flattened
file offset-length pairs.
This issue does not happen when using MPICH 4.1 and later. As pointed out
in issue #7163, it is because
MPIX_Type_iov
functions are used to flattenthe fileview datatype since version 4.1 and
MPIX_Type_iov
functionsappear to be able to produce correct offset-length pairs.
I encountered this problem when running jobs on Perlmutter at NERSC,
whose MPI makes use of a ROMIO from MPICH earlier than 4.1. I believe
there are other MPI vendors that also use an older version of ROMIO.
Smaller reproducers are available in
The difference between the two programs are the call to
MPI_Type_indexed()
andMPI_Type_create_hindexed()
.If they are replaced by
MPI_Type_create_struct()
, asin struct_fsize.c, then the generated offset-length pairs
are correct and hence the test program passed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: