UI Changes to make better Metadata for the Validators #95
Description
There needs to be more error trapping and explicitly defined fields.
Whilst reviewing https://validators.poa.network/ for myself, I saw a number of mistakes/issues (screen shots upon request - however, if you just look you too will see these.) I too had an issue initially during Network roll as a member of the Trinity Validator Set. I believe my issue was whether or not to use a comma or semi-semicolon to separate fields.
There were obviously bigger issues in those days. However, the issues that I’m seeing are probably fixed with a small cleanup of the UI. I think having explicitly defined fields such as:
Address 1, Address 2, City, State (Drop down), ZIP, USA (automatically appended due to current requirement - but there for completeness):
Furthermore - I actually think that we ought to hook in a third party API to check and perhaps suggests an address after the user submits there work. Should the individual not take the requirement - I’d like to suggest the idea of presenting the one that the individual provided AND the API for all to see.
In the case of a minor issue, I fully expect a reasonable individual to understand. But if there’s a ‘larger’ issue - again, I trust in the individual reviewing the data to come to their own conclusions.