Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle azimuth-only rotators better. #835

Open
darksidelemm opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Handle azimuth-only rotators better. #835

darksidelemm opened this issue Nov 22, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@darksidelemm
Copy link
Member

Add an option into the config to define that a rotator is azimuth-only. If this is enabled, only send azimuth data.

@vg1320
Copy link

vg1320 commented Nov 23, 2023

I have forgotten to mention that Rémi's F1NNI rotor is a Spid Rak model.

@darksidelemm
Copy link
Member Author

Issues with specific rotators is something you'll have to take up with hamlib.

My intention for this fix is:

  • Add a configuration parameter in the rotator section called 'azimuth_only', set to False by default.
  • If the azimuth_only setting is set to True, then:
    • Ignore any elevation information provided by the rotctld daemon.
    • Set elevation to 0 when sending commands to rotctld.

As I don't have any azimuth-only rotator to test with, hopefully this will be sufficient. Unfortunately the hamlib 'dummy rotator' emulates an az-el rotator.

What would be useful to confirm is:

  • What is the response from rotctld to a 'p' command? e.g. my az/el rotator returns two lines, one with azimuth, one with elevation. Is this the case for Rémi's rotator?

@vg1320
Copy link

vg1320 commented Nov 23, 2023

Yes it is the case for Rémi's rotator :
image

@darksidelemm
Copy link
Member Author

There's a new azimuth_only option in the testing branch, v1.7.5-beta4. I've only done some very basic testing of this on my az/el rotator, so I cant really be sure if it will work correctly for an azimuth-only rotator.
If you can test this change, that would be much appreciated!

@vg1320
Copy link

vg1320 commented Aug 31, 2024

Thanks to Rémi F1NNI, a test of v1.7.5-beta4 was successful this afternoon by chasing the 306-2-00201 released from Guipavas

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants