Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Idea Review]: Filecoin pledge token #70

Open
anorth opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Idea Review]: Filecoin pledge token #70

anorth opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Idea Review Ideas not part of a FIP that require analysis

Comments

@anorth
Copy link

anorth commented Dec 12, 2022

Request Summary

See https://www.notion.so/pl-strflt/Filecoin-pledge-token-8855f4a974ec4b8da306e8667f4682aa

There is a circular dependency between pledge amounts and circulating supply which causes a destabilising dynamic. When the rate of change of token supply is far from zero, changing incentives for onboarding push it yet further from zero. In particular, when net onboarding is low or negative, the return on pledge of committing/extending sectors is decreasing, further discouraging onboarding.

Instead of pledging FIL, storage providers can be required to pledge a new token, PFIL, at the same rate as the current pledge formula. The network permits a 1:1 conversion of FIL to PFIL, but not the other way round. The FIL for sector pledging is thus permanently allocated to pledge. When a sector expires or is terminated, PFIL tokens are returned to the provider. These PFIL tokens can be used to pledge or extend a new sector, but cannot be converted back to FIL. Unlocked PFIL can be transferred freely, traded, etc.

Audience / Consumer for this Review

Core Developers, Storage Providers

Timeframe

No Rush

Rationale

This is an idea that should be in your mix of solution pieces. It's not clear that it's good in its current form, and is limited in when it could be applied. But has potential to stabilise circulating supply.

Desired Deliverables

No response

Additional Information

No response

Contact Details (if Private Response Requested)

No response

@anorth anorth added the Idea Review Ideas not part of a FIP that require analysis label Dec 12, 2022
@AxCortesCubero
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @anorth, I've made a brief analysis on the pledge token mechanism, and commented it on your notion page. As I say there, my feelings are mixed at the moment, maybe worth exploring more. Let me know if I got something wrong of the original proposal, or if you have any other particular question about it!

@anorth
Copy link
Author

anorth commented Jan 31, 2023

Thanks! Nice work. I concur that a better feel for in which situations the positive feedback dynamic exists, and when the share-of-power overtakes it, would be a next step to understanding the possible relevance of this idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Idea Review Ideas not part of a FIP that require analysis
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants