-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Description
While I am trying to make our classes compatible with sklearn as much as possible (in #10 we start subclassing BaseEstimator
), there are some limits to this at the moment. Notably, the signature of fit in sklearn estimator should be fit(X, y)
, while we have fit(X, y, geometry)
. I believe that what we have is the best option but it makes non-conformant.
We fail sklearn.utils.estimator_checks.check_estimator
checks due to expected geometry
and stuff like GridSearchCV
does not work either as it is unable to pass geometry
to predict
. Same issue applies to score
.
We could potentially pass geometry
within init
but then any CV splits would break anyway. Alternatively, geometry
could be part of X
but then none of the transformers in sklearn pipelines will work.
I am not sure if there is a way to make our API fully sklearn compatible at the moment.