Skip to content

More flexible predefined facilities #385

@jGaboardi

Description

@jGaboardi

As demonstrated in #352 and resolved in #384, the strict binary implementation of predefined facilities needed clearer explanation. To further the ease of use, we should consider adding functionality for predefining facilities by name or label, or possibly even based on condition (though that would take some more work).

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions