Skip to content

default no-checkpoint-warning-decorators #313

Open
@jakkdl

Description

@jakkdl

#309 (comment)

I'm also inclined to include FastAPI support in the default no-checkpoint-decorators; reducing the low-value-alarm rate for users is more important than my personal distaste for missing checkpoints 😅. That can easily go in a future PR though.

hrm. suppressing it for async124 makes lots of sense, but less so for async9xx... if they got suppressed for cases where async124 would get suppressed >_<
I guess that's a point in favor of default-disabling it for async124 in particular regardless of no-checkpoint-decorator

also probably suppress async9xx for functions where async124 triggers

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    rule improvementImprovement for currently existing rule

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions