[Question] Using qNegIntegratedPosteriorVariance
as a value function in KG
#1267
-
Is it possible to use I tried including
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hmm it seems like here you're passing a class not a class instance to the acquisition function?
The Knowledge Gradient essentially uses the posterior mean as the value function. We have In either case, if you can share a full repro it will be easier for us to debug. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hmm it seems like here you're passing a class not a class instance to the acquisition function?
The Knowledge Gradient essentially uses the posterior mean as the value function. We have
qMultiStepLookahead
that is quite modular and allows you to specify the value function class (as well as a factory function to construct the arguments for its constructors from the data). I would start there.In either case, if you can share a full repro it will be easier for us to debug.