-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Open
Description
Information
-
Qiskit IonQ Provider version: 0.5.8
-
Qiskit version: 1.1.0
-
Python version: 3.9.6
-
Operating system: macOS Sequoia v15.1.1
What is the current behavior?
Using transpile() from qiskit, I am trying to transpile a given circuit into the native set of gates of IonQ Forte 1, which considers ZZ gates instead of MS gates, as IonQ Aria platforms have.
Steps to reproduce the problem
from qiskit_ionq import IonQProvider
from qiskit import QuantumCircuit, transpile
provider = IonQProvider(token='your token')
native_simulator = provider.get_backend('ionq_simulator', gateset='native')
native_simulator.set_options(noise_model='forte-1')
qc = QuantumCircuit(2)
qc.rzz(1, 0, 1)
transpiled_qc = transpile(qc, backend=native_simulator, optimization_level=3)
print(transpiled_qc.count_ops()) # OrderedDict([('gpi2', 10), ('ms', 2), ('gpi', 1)])What is the expected behavior?
Instead of MS gates, the transpiler should be aware of the backend chosen and transpile accordingly. If Forte backend is chosen, use ZZ as entangling gates instead.
Suggested solutions
The provider.get_backend() function could include a new input which is the device selected.
- If
device='aria-1': use GPi, GPi2 and MS gates. - If
device='forte-1': use GPi, GPi2 and ZZ gates.
splch
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels