Open
Description
DBItest/R/spec-compliance-methods.R
Lines 52 to 53 in f19fb4d
I think the reasoning here is faulty, and can see reasons why it's not a great idea (e.g. any analyst needing >1 such "compliant" backend in their script will be greeted with a flood of "masked in global environment" packageStartupMessage
s).
The crux of the comment seems to be we want to test that RMyBackend::
form works, which only requires that {RMyBackend}'s NAMESPACE
has the appropriate importClassesFrom()
directives. Should we change this test to check the NAMESPACE
instead?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels