-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check as CRAN? #644
Comments
R-hub v2 always uses |
Ah, I do see the https://github.com/jonocarroll/ntfy/actions/runs/11583975213 I ran this with |
Yes, the non-container workflows do set |
I don't have my own GHA CI set up yet, but I will probably do so - I find the rhub offering to be very convenient and I don't usually have to worry about skipped tests. I would certainly benefit from some runners which are specific to CRAN submissions. Are any of the container workflows suitable for this? |
I changed the |
Thank you - I have all green lights now in https://github.com/jonocarroll/ntfy/actions/runs/11592208228 -- I hope this makes sense as a default; it does for me - this service is most helpful to me when releasing a package to CRAN, so mimicking that environment as much as possible is extremely valuable. |
Apologies if this is handled in rhubv2, but if it is, I could not find it.
Is it possible to set
NOT_CRAN=FALSE
with the rhubv2? I am preparing a package for submission that requires a lot of network tests, and I've usedskip_on_cran()
for these to sidestep the potential failures. I have tested locally, but I would also like to use the automated runners if possible.rhubv1 set
check_args = "--as-cran"
but I don't see an equivalent for v2.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: