Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Objection detect code #2

Closed
C-C-Y opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 9 comments
Closed

Objection detect code #2

C-C-Y opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 9 comments

Comments

@C-C-Y
Copy link

C-C-Y commented Mar 30, 2023

Hello, may I ask when the code for object detection will be released? I look forward to your response. Thank you.

@rayleizhu
Copy link
Owner

The MM project series share the same backbone usage. Hence it is not difficult to transfer the segmentation code to detection.

As you asked, I will arrange the release in two weeks.

@C-C-Y
Copy link
Author

C-C-Y commented Mar 30, 2023

The MM project series share the same backbone usage. Hence it is not difficult to transfer the segmentation code to detection.

As you asked, I will arrange the release in two weeks.

Thank you very much.

@LMMMEng
Copy link

LMMMEng commented Mar 31, 2023

Thank you for your wonderful work! Could you please release the config file for the detection first?

@rayleizhu
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your wonderful work! Could you please release the config file for the detection first?

Maybe by next Friday. I cannot guarantee as there are many other things on my hand. But I'm sure the full detection code can be released in two weeks.

@Hiyao-yy
Copy link

Hiyao-yy commented Apr 5, 2023

Thanks for sharing, looking forward to the full detection code!

@rayleizhu
Copy link
Owner

rayleizhu commented Apr 11, 2023

The object detection code has been released.

Note that you need to update the environment if you have done setup previously.

@LMMMEng
Copy link

LMMMEng commented Apr 12, 2023

Thanks for your effort, I wonder if norm eval can improve performance

self.norm_eval = norm_eval

Moreover, could you let me know what the bugs are on the normalization layer?

@rayleizhu
Copy link
Owner

rayleizhu commented Apr 12, 2023

Thanks for your effort, I wonder if norm eval can improve performance

I did not remember how much it helps. You may have a try. If you have a conclusion, please tell me here. By the way, norm_eval=True is the default choice of mmdetetction:

Moreover, could you let me know what the bugs are on the normalization layer?

See my comments here:

# NOTE: in the version before submission:

Actually, I do not know if it is this modification that works. There are some other differences (not in my model but functions or environment provided by third parties), as I mentioned in the README.

@LMMMEng
Copy link

LMMMEng commented Apr 12, 2023

Thanks for your effort, I wonder if norm eval can improve performance

I did not remember how much it helps. You may have a try. If you have a conclusion, please tell me here. By the way, norm_eval=True is the default choice of mmdetetction:

Moreover, could you let me know what the bugs are on the normalization layer?

See my comments here:

# NOTE: in the version before submission:

Actually, I do not know if it is this modification that works. There are some other differences (not in my model but functions or environment provided by third parties), as I mentioned in the README.

Many thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants