Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate x.boot extension for indirect effects #1

Open
1 task
rempsyc opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

Investigate x.boot extension for indirect effects #1

rempsyc opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@rempsyc
Copy link
Owner

rempsyc commented Aug 24, 2022

Christian wrote, about lavaanExtra,

I like the approach. Thanks for putting so much work into it! About the indirect effects: That's great and will probably reduce specification errors. I posted a while ago an extension of x.boot that (hopefully) automatically identifies and calculates all indirect effects: https://groups.google.com/g/lavaan/c/0RSsh4M6zQg/m/V2zKKV7FAwAJ A bit like Amos, but not limited to x->m->y. The extension is computationally intensive and not efficient. i haven't had the time or inclination to program a better solution yet. But maybe the two approaches can be combined? I don't know what that would look like exactly. It's just an idea.

  • Assess if and how that feature should be integrated.
@rempsyc rempsyc added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Feb 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant