Skip to content

Port types? #22

Open
Open
@ajkeller34

Description

@ajkeller34

In discussing #11, Michael wrote:

After some thought, I agree that Cascade is not really necessary and given that things are generally more readable without it I'm in favor of making this change. I do like being able to specify what happens to the ports ahead of time though, as this would avoid some repeated code in the code for the paper. So if you have ideas for a better way to do that, that would be cool, though it's not that important.

To accomplish such functionality, it seems like a Port type would be necessary.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions