Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does zama16b have some impact on zalasr #8

Open
romanheros opened this issue Jun 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Does zama16b have some impact on zalasr #8

romanheros opened this issue Jun 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@romanheros
Copy link

From priviledged 1.13 specification, misaligned atomicity granule PMA has superseded the proposed Zam extension. I think we should explicitly remove the Zam description in Zalasr specificatio and add the Zama16b impact on it, as Zama16b has been selected as a develeopment optional extension in RVA23 profile.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant