|
7 | 7 | - [azure](https://github.com/robfatland/nexus/blob/gh-pages/ai/azure.md) cloud: stub |
8 | 8 |
|
9 | 9 |
|
| 10 | +# en avance: Notes from a lecture by Elle O'Brien (UMich School of Information) |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Past org: Data Version Control |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +- Code LLMs (abbreviated here CL) regarding simulation, cata collection, etcetera |
| 15 | +- Undertrained as a Developer? You must be a Scientist! |
| 16 | +- Debugging code you didn't write is difficult |
| 17 | +- Inaccuracies in code and comments are a liability |
| 18 | +- Science context: What is "testing practice"? |
| 19 | +- Survey of scientists who use CL: Excerpted outcomes |
| 20 | + - Who are you? Life sciences and engineering and etcetera |
| 21 | + - What CL do you use? Partial: They use Chatbots not GitHub Copilot 3:1 |
| 22 | + - Chatbots produce longer blocks of code (hypothesis: this increases the cognitive load on R) |
| 23 | + - Use case: "language changes" (e.g. due to legacy code, changing labs, specialty tools etcetera) |
| 24 | + - Chat is 1000x easier than documentation... |
| 25 | + - Why use documentation? CL can read and apply it for me |
| 26 | + - Testing: Ad hoc, eyeball, not systematic |
| 27 | + - Unsurprising: This can easily lead to failure modes |
| 28 | + - Incorrect mental models by R can lead to failure modes |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +The bottom line seems to be: People with experience and skill in software development, the lower the |
| 32 | +"productivity boost". |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +Questions |
| 36 | +- How does Model Context Protocol (MCP) enter into mitigating negative outcomes? Does it exacerbate? |
| 37 | +- What is the status of RAG? By this I mean: Has it been "abstracted away" into new terminology? |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | + |
10 | 41 | # artificial intelligence |
11 | 42 |
|
12 | 43 |
|
|
0 commit comments