Study the possibility of improving the AMCx architectural models for cleaner rotor-stator calibration implementation

[mfussi66]

After successfully testing in simulation the qenc (rotor-stator) calibration in #133, we noticed that we could improve the implementation by making improvements to the architectural model of the AMC( _/BLDC/FOC) boards. This step can be a first one towards the architecture proposed in #134 .

For example, we need to evaluate if it's beneficial to create a Process Sensors block outside of the motion controller, putting it on the toplevel architecture. Additionally, an important constraint, we would like to keep the inputs and outputs untouched.

[RaffaelePumpo]

I propose inserting a new component called Processing Sensors between the Motor Sensors and the Motion Controller. This block would handle both the Event (required for the correct interpretation of sensor data, such as motor configuration) and the Raw Sensors:

Additionally, I suggest removing the offset interface from the QuadratureEncoder and instead including it in the EstimatedData structure. This would allow the offset to be passed directly to the estimation block, and from there to the supervisor.

The supervisor could then:

1. Save the offset in the Actuator Configuration (in the case of a full calibration).

2. Output the offset outside the motion controller if needed.

Furthermore the inputs and ouputs of the motion controller remains untouched.

As a result, the testing setup would look like this:

[RaffaelePumpo]

We could study also the architecture in which FOC and Calibrator are out of the motion controller