Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Joint Names Convention #53

Open
thiagodefreitas opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Joint Names Convention #53

thiagodefreitas opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@thiagodefreitas
Copy link
Contributor

Check the feasibility of changing back the joint names for the SDA10F and SIA10F from motoman_joint_N_L to motoman_joint_L

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

@shaun-edwards: do you remember why you closed this?

The current driver cannot use any other names than joint_N_L because of #111.

If that gets fixed, then the specific naming scheme used for joints won't matter any longer (making reverting the names to what @thiagodefreitas describes feasible).

@thiagodefreitas
Copy link
Contributor Author

thiagodefreitas commented Jun 22, 2018

@gavanderhoorn I really did not see your mention on #111 for the last(very sorry) 2 years 🤕 ❓ ❗️

I hope @shaun-edwards has some better direct input. Although not having an accessible motorman robot at the moment, I can of course scratch some old notes and see how I could help.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

I've got fixes for just about all the outstanding old bugs locally, including #111.

There are some places where things happen I do not fully understand though. So if I find myself in a situation where I could use some help I'll @-mention you.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

@thiagodefreitas: I'd like to make use of your offer to look at your notes. Could you take a look at #226?

gavanderhoorn added a commit to gavanderhoorn/motoman_experimental that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants