Replies: 5 comments
-
Do others agree this would be a good idea? If so I could open PR with this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
we don't have any js dependency beside jquery (which can probably be removed as well). No plans or need for ES6 either. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I am closing this. Feel free to re-open if you think this would be of significant help for us. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @sonalkr132, Thanks for the feedback.
As far as I can see there's also 2 extra JS dependencies in
Apart from the usefulness of keeping the existing dependencies up to date more easily, opening this issue was also motivated by the fact that I was having trouble introducing a new JS dependency in the WebAuthn pull request (#2108 (comment)). The complication was due to the fact that Not a huge thing - but wanted to give more details behind my original motivation if helpful. Thanks again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
this is valid point. I think our intention with vendoring everything is to avoid depending on third party system for build/deployment. I guess this should be open for discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think it would be good to have
webpacker
/webpack
for managing and updating JS depedencies more easily.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions