-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verification failures on ARMv6, 32-bit, little-endian, Raspberry Pi B #299
Comments
darkk
added a commit
to darkk/smhasher
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2024
polymur Verification value 0xA612032C means that polymur_seed_init() was not called. Currently, polymur is compiled in unconditionally, so it should be initialized unconditionally as well. See rurban#294, rurban#296, rurban#297, rurban#298 and rurban#299.
darkk
added a commit
to darkk/smhasher
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2024
It fixes arm builds, including macos-14-arm64 polymur Verification value 0xA612032C means that polymur_seed_init() was not called. Currently, polymur is compiled in unconditionally, so it should be initialized unconditionally as well. See rurban#294, rurban#296, rurban#297, rurban#298 and rurban#299.
darkk
added a commit
to darkk/smhasher
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2024
It fixes arm builds, including macos-14-arm64 polymur Verification value 0xA612032C means that polymur_seed_init() was not called. Currently, polymur is compiled in unconditionally, so it should be initialized unconditionally as well. See rurban#294, rurban#296, rurban#297, rurban#298 and rurban#299.
darkk
added a commit
to darkk/smhasher
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2024
It fixes arm builds, including macos-14-arm64 polymur Verification value 0xA612032C means that polymur_seed_init() was not called. Currently, polymur is compiled in unconditionally, so it should be initialized unconditionally as well. See rurban#294, rurban#296, rurban#297, rurban#298 and rurban#299.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Building SMHasher with OpenWrt GCC 12.3.0 r24012-d8dd03c46f (toolchain-arm_arm1176jzf-s+vfp_gcc-12.3.0_musl_eabi) with
-O2 -DHAVE_NEON
highlights following failures:blake3_c - Verification value 0x50E4CD91 ....... FAIL! (Expected 0x58571F56)
, same as Verification failures on MIPS32, little-endian #297tabulation32 - Verification value 0xCC4CFFDC ....... FAIL! (Expected 0x335F64EA)
, same as Verification failures on MIPS32, little-endian #297polymur - Verification value 0xA612032C ....... FAIL! (Expected 0x4F894810)
, same as Verification failures on MIPS32, little-endian #297FNV128 - Verification value 0x000000BA ....... FAIL! (Expected 0xBCAA1426)
, same as Verification failures on MSVC=1, PLATFORM=x86 #296superfast - Verification value 0x6306A6FE ....... FAIL! (Expected 0x0C80403A)
The machine is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: