Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PushBytes::read_scriptint is a bit unwieldy #3479

Closed
tcharding opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

PushBytes::read_scriptint is a bit unwieldy #3479

tcharding opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@tcharding
Copy link
Member

While upgrading mininscript to track master branch I found that the PushBytes::read_scriptint function is unwieldy.

Should we add this back in:

/// Decodes an integer in script(minimal CScriptNum) format.
///
/// See [`PushBytes::read_scriptint`] for documentation.
pub fn read_scriptint(v: &[u8]) -> Result<i64, Error> {
    let push = <&PushBytes>::try_from(v).map_err(|_| Error::NumericOverflow)?;
    push.read_scriptint()
}
@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

It looks like there are two places where we call this method in miniscript. One is to convert a slice from script::Instruction::PushBytes which for some reason holds a &[u8] instead of a PushBytes. Shouldn't it hold a PushBytes instead?

The other is in witness_to_scriptsig in src/util.rs which is, frankly, a bizarre method and I think it's fine if the code there is a bit unwieldy.

@tcharding
Copy link
Member Author

It looks like there are two places where we call this method in miniscript. One is to convert a slice from script::Instruction::PushBytes which for some reason holds a &[u8] instead of a PushBytes. Shouldn't it hold a PushBytes instead?

This is a bitcoin::script::Instruction::PushBytes(PushBytes) so this call site is ok.

The other is in witness_to_scriptsig in src/util.rs which is, frankly, a bizarre method and I think it's fine if the code there is a bit unwieldy.

This is the call site that caused me to raise the issue, so you've cleared it up nicely. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants