You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've tried with a basic brusselator example, converting the file first to ODE's then trying to run the converter to restore the reactions:
Original Reaction Scheme:
# Name Reaction Rate Law Flux [mmol/s] Number Flux [1/(s)] Noise Expression
1 R1 A -> X Mass action (irreversible) nan nan
2 R2 2 * X + Y -> 3 * X Mass action (irreversible) nan nan
3 R3 X + B -> Y + D Mass action (irreversible) nan nan
4 R4 X -> E Mass action (irreversible) nan nan
New Reaction
after running the conversion to ode and back the resulting scheme was:
# Name Reaction Rate Law Flux [mmol/s] Number Flux [1/(s)] Noise Expression
1 J1 -> X; A Function for J1 nan nan
2 J2 X + Y -> X + Y Function for J2 nan nan
3 J3 X -> X + Y; B Function for J3 nan nan
4 J4 X -> X Function for J4 nan nan
New Reaction
Originally X and Y were floating, A, B, D and E boundary.
The stoichiometries look strange to me. (since it was just mass action, it is fine that D and E do not appear in the reaction sche. I'm even fine with A and B being modifier rather than substrates.
it is however problematic, that in the resulting model X and Y are also boundary.
I've tried with a basic brusselator example, converting the file first to ODE's then trying to run the converter to restore the reactions:
Original Reaction Scheme:
after running the conversion to ode and back the resulting scheme was:
Originally X and Y were floating, A, B, D and E boundary.
I'll attach the ode version of the model.
BrusselatorODE.xml.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: