Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

issues with ODE -> Reaction converter #402

Open
fbergmann opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

issues with ODE -> Reaction converter #402

fbergmann opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@fbergmann
Copy link
Member

I've tried with a basic brusselator example, converting the file first to ODE's then trying to run the converter to restore the reactions:

Original Reaction Scheme:

	#	Name	Reaction	Rate Law	Flux [mmol/s]	Number Flux [1/(s)]	Noise Expression
	1	R1	A -> X	Mass action (irreversible)	nan	nan	
	2	R2	2 * X + Y -> 3 * X	Mass action (irreversible)	nan	nan	
	3	R3	X + B -> Y + D	Mass action (irreversible)	nan	nan	
	4	R4	X -> E	Mass action (irreversible)	nan	nan	
		New Reaction					

after running the conversion to ode and back the resulting scheme was:

	#	Name	Reaction	Rate Law	Flux [mmol/s]	Number Flux [1/(s)]	Noise Expression
	1	J1	 -> X;  A	Function for J1	nan	nan	
	2	J2	X + Y -> X + Y	Function for J2	nan	nan	
	3	J3	X -> X + Y;  B	Function for J3	nan	nan	
	4	J4	X -> X	Function for J4	nan	nan	
		New Reaction					

Originally X and Y were floating, A, B, D and E boundary.

  • The stoichiometries look strange to me. (since it was just mass action, it is fine that D and E do not appear in the reaction sche. I'm even fine with A and B being modifier rather than substrates.
  • it is however problematic, that in the resulting model X and Y are also boundary.

I'll attach the ode version of the model.

BrusselatorODE.xml.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants