You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hope I have not overlooked it, but I miss an intuitive function or button to add a certain object to a group. As far as I understood the only way to add an object to a group is:
Go to Object->Groups
Click on the group
Click on "Edit Object"
In section Objects, click on "+"-Button
Select object from dropdown
Click on "Save"
I think a common scenerio would be that I'm on the site of an object (e.g. ../objects/5) and want to add the object to an existing or even new group. Then I would expect a button like "Add to group" where I get a list of all available groups and can select the group to which I want to add the object. Alternatively I would like to "Create a new group". Maybe after clicking on such a button a modal opens with these functionalities. This way one can reduce the procedure from 6 to 3 click events.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Object groups are realized as an custom action_type in the local SampleDB instance you are using and not a common SampleDB feature. Therefore they are handled as "normal" objects.
I will think about better ways to integrate this functionality.
I hope I have not overlooked it, but I miss an intuitive function or button to add a certain object to a group. As far as I understood the only way to add an object to a group is:
I think a common scenerio would be that I'm on the site of an object (e.g. ../objects/5) and want to add the object to an existing or even new group. Then I would expect a button like "Add to group" where I get a list of all available groups and can select the group to which I want to add the object. Alternatively I would like to "Create a new group". Maybe after clicking on such a button a modal opens with these functionalities. This way one can reduce the procedure from 6 to 3 click events.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: