-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
verify various request forms #141
Comments
This ticket is blocked by #151 |
alishaevn
changed the title
fix the lean six sigma request form
verify various request forms
Jan 24, 2023
I may need to check in with sherman about the different dynamic form types. but first, I'd like to compare the ui options code in webstore vs the one in the rx-lite app. it may be a view issue and not a schema issue. 🤔 |
instead of trying to update the formatting for these various forms in the webstore, we're going to just go forward with working on the api. re: #162 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Story
When we created the request form, it was all based on the "general" dynamic form. As I was viewing the request form for the lean six sigma item, I noticed that the form didn't display as expected. Most likely it's using a different form type with some properties we aren't accounting for. We ought to look at the form for every item on acme prod in the webstore to make sure that we're accounting for multiple scenarios.
BTW -- the javascript manipulation we're doing in the webtore will eventually all be moved to the api or rx app
demo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: