Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hatch vs uv #331

Open
grst opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

hatch vs uv #331

grst opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@grst
Copy link
Collaborator

grst commented Oct 25, 2024

We currently suggest to use hatch with a uv backend.

However, uv is already a quite powerful project management tool by itself.
The only piece that seems to be missing is a definition of development commands, such as

[tool.hatch.envs.docs]
features = [ "doc" ]
scripts.build = "sphinx-build -M html docs docs/_build {args}"

But there's an active discussion to support that as well: astral-sh/uv#5903.

@flying-sheep
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the pointer! I don’t think keeping this open makes sense at the moment though.

Hatch’s environment definition is pretty fully-featured and mature. I don’t think uv can catch up within a few months (if they decide to grow that feature at all).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants