Measurement rate instead of oversampling rate used for generation of scaling factor

[jadeaffenjaeger]

Hi, thank you for your work with this library!
I'm currently building a project based on the DPS310 and am using parts of your code to interface with the sensor.

While connecting my sensor, I noticed that the measurement rate (i.e. the burst length when using the sensor in Background mode) is stored in the variables g_pressure_rate and g_temperature_rate and subsequently used to derive the scale factor.

sensor-dps310/dps310.c

Lines 271 to 298 in e2ee938

	switch (rate) {
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_1_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 524288;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_2_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 1572864;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_4_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 3670016;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_8_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 7864320;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_16_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 253952;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_32_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 516096;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_64_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 1040384;
	break;
	case DPS310_CFG_RATE_128_MEAS:
	*p_factor = 2088960;
	break;
	default:
	ret = DPS310_UNKNOWN_RATE_ERROR;
	}

This leads to wrong results since the relevant parameter for deriving the scale factor is actually the oversampling rate (see Table 9 in the datasheet).

[Lucianovici]

@jadeaffenjaeger Thank you very much for this observation - would you like to submit a pull request?
I was inspired from the original library available on Infineon github repo.
Maybe you would like to create an issue also on their repo - to help fix this.

https://github.com/Infineon/DPS310-Pressure-Sensor/blob/667f6e0d17696e683d36361cdad8fd1d62a198a7/src/DpsClass.cpp#L4