Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Empty frames in ethercat debug data #145

Open
guihomework opened this issue Jul 13, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Empty frames in ethercat debug data #145

guihomework opened this issue Jul 13, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@guihomework
Copy link
Contributor

In rosbag recording ethercat debug data, we noticed some rare (0.003% of the messages) incoming messages are completely empty.

Good data

1463751182233841219,409523,1463751182235725486,,3433,2547,3428,2183,2952,2880,3105,2131,3627,2833,3286,2255,2944,2432,3097,2117,2096,1119,1787,1800,2145,1983,14,3040,1275,2484,0,0,0,0,0,0,7,18,5,9,0,5,1,699050,0,3,20,-12,-2,8,-1,0,0,1,0,2,3,1,4,12,1,1,1,7,0,1,31,1023,1023,1023,1023,1023,322

Empty data

1463751182234379755,409524,1463751182236515571,,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

The filters would not see that change, but some joints are not filtered right now.
Even if all joints were filtered, does it make sense to send an empty frame (invalid data) ? Is it not better to not publish invalid data ?
You might argue this is debug data, but actually this topic is used by the calibration tool, and we used it for researching on raw vs real angle calibration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant