The website should be rewritten to reflect current project goals rather than Simon's goals when he wrote SILE #1729
Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
Sorry to ask. What are these? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Also the point raised in #1720 goes beyond the web site "bragging". In the SILE manual itself, my emphasis:
Which such a claim, the grid implementation has to be real robust, iron-tested, well-documented, and... used, used, used.
(Removed after a second thought = a long list of issues... Ask me privately, because it makes the picture real bad and that's not my intent here.) ... Yet it tells people TeX is less advanced, indeed... How to expect people won't get frustrated?
SILE's frame implementation is broken in many places, entangled with global variables, side effects, &c. ... so the claim is pretty wild. And don't get me started on frames with different widths ("Pushback must die"), or absence of decent support for real multi-columns, well-balanced (#118), and a working solution for switching between several columns on the same page (see my recent experiments on Gitter). ... And that's just for the insane level of bragging found on the web site and in the manual. As I wrote in #1720, this can only lead to users being frustrated as they realize the software doesn't deliver what it says so vividly on and on... Less bragging = Staying true about what it does (sometimes well) or where it errs. Without trying to convince it does better than X or Y. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think most of this was addressed:
After almost one year, I don't think there's much to add here -- But of course, please feel free to open new issues or discussions on specific items. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since Simon doesn't work much on SILE anymore, this makes sense to me. It leads to dashed user expectations, see #1720. Split from there so as not to talk about project meta in a bug report.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions